The mistreatment of older people is categorized in many societies as "elder abuse and neglect," yet the concept has not been subjected to rigorous critical inquiry. Instead, it has most often represented the interests of professionals, academics, and governments, while policy makers and researchers frequently overlook or disregard the complexity of issues that fall under this designation.
Contesting Elder Abuse and Neglect questions existing understandings about the mistreatment of older people. It explores how and why the designation "elder abuse and neglect" came to be and shows how this term masks problems concerning the mistreatment of older people, their place in society, and how they see themselves. Joan R. Harbison and her colleagues expose how supposed solutions to the problem of abuse can take their toll on those people they were originally intended to protect. The book is an important contribution to the literature that encourages new thinking about issues concerning the mistreatment of older people.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
1 Gerontology, Theorizing, and "Elder Abuse and Neglect"
2 "Elder Abuse and Neglect": A Metahistorical Analysis
3 Struggles in Defining "Elder Abuse and Neglect"
4 The Emerging Global Context for "Elder Abuse and Neglect"
5 How Constructions of Older People Shape Their Relationships to "Elder Abuse and Neglect"
6 Adult Protection Legislation, the Rhetoric of Rights, and the "Right" to Protection
7 How Policies Control Practices
8 Reconstructing the Mistreatment of Older People through Research-Based Knowledge
9 Conclusion: Searching for a Strong Foundation on Which to Reconstruct the (Mis)Treatment of Older People
References
Index
