This text grew out of the author's life-long interest in biographies and her clinical work with people who have suffered bad accidents. Some individuals become significantly disorganized and distressed after what was a minor event by any objective criterion, while others who experience a vastly more terrible event often show a remarkable resilience. In attempting to make sense of this diversity of responses, Bowman studied coping behaviours earlier in her research career. It became clear that long-standing personality styles and beliefs played a powerful moderating role in the relations between objective adversity and apparent distress responses. Despite this evidence, the idea that terrible life events have significant power in affecting mental health has become increasingly popular within professional mental health disciplines and in popular thinking. In particular, the use of the post traumatic distress disorder as a diagnosis has served as a prototype for this thinking, with gradual extension to an ever-wider array of life experiences. Encounters with hundreds of patients over the years, along with research into the connections between stress, coping and distress led Bowman to an increasing concern about the assumptions mental health professionals were using in their clinical work with people seeking help for event-attributed distress. She began to study the evidence concerning the power of life experiences to account for chronic emotional problems that were attributed to these "stressors", and discovered that clinical practice was based on an exaggerated idea of the power of life events and a correspondingly significant inattention to pre-existing factors. These factors have been extensively examined in experimental and correlational studies within the fields of stress and coping, in personality studies of emotionality, and in social psychology through studies of attributional processes and their effects on behaviour. The evidence was so compelling about the power of individual differences in accounting for prolonged distress outcomes after "toxic" life events that the author found she had to write this book. It represents both a testament to the resilience of those who have been able to surmount horrible experiences, and a different way of thinking about those who find themselves significantly disabled after apparently minor or singular nasty events. This way of rethinking prolonged distress syndromes should help to direct treatment in ways that will be more helpful than the very event-focused treatment models currently used.

Table of Contents:

Contents: Preface. Is There a Problem in Understanding Post-Event Distress? How Prevalent Are Toxic Events and Event-Attributed Clinical Distress Disorders? Do More Terrible Events Lead to More Serious Disorders? What Are Typical Responses to Direct Exposure to Toxic Life Events? What Are the Effects of Indirect Toxic Exposures? How Much Do Individual Differences in Pre-Event Competencies Affect Responses to a Toxic Event? How Powerful Are Individual Differences in Emotionality? Do Beliefs Affect Individual Reactions to Toxic Events? Do Groups Differ in Post-Event Reactions? Which Has More Power in Determining Distress, the Event or the Person? Why Are Clinicians Reluctant to Look for Causes Beyond the Event? How Important Are Emotions as a Guide to Well-Being? Can Professional Treatments Remedy Event-Attributed Distress? Conclusion and Implications.