About the Book
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1872 edition. Excerpt: ...Digest, by which the proceeds of the sale go to the extinguishment of the oldest lien, no matter how the property may be sold; and this seems to be the universal rule where there is no statutory provision to the contrary. State 12. Salyers, 1.9 lnoZ., 432; Straley's appeal, 45' Penn. S. R., 8.9; Thompson 12. Cardel. 27 Ga, 273; 1 Tenn. R, 729; Russell 12. Gibbs, 5 Carr.,5'90; Rowe v. Richardson. 5 Barb., 385; Lynch v. Hanahan, 9 Rich., (Law. S. C.) 186; Gilmer 11. Warren, 17 Ga., 426; 1 Paige Chy., 181, 558; Neill o. Lancks, 6' Barb., 470; Bagley v. Reeves, 20 Ala., 427; Brown 1: . Hainlin 23./1iss., 3.92; Peck v. Tiflany, 2 Comst., 451; Steele v Hanna, 8 Blac-kf., 326'; Newton o. Nunnelly,4 Ga., 356. The question as to the sherifl' being made a party, cannot arise here, as he is not making any contest. Ringgold '0. Stone, 20 Ark., 526; and, being an ofiicer of the court, he is presumed to have notice. Brant's appeal, 20 Tenn., 8 (Harris) 364., . " Where the parties, interested in the distribution of money in the sherifi"s hands, appear, and statean agreed case, the court may determine the right, although the sheriff has not made the application." Turner v. Lawrence, 11 Ala.., 426'. The court will not disturb the verdict below for any error which could not injure the appellants. Clark v. Barnett, 94 Ark., 30; Blackwell '0. Pattan, 7 Crunch, 471, -Campbell 0. Pratt, 2 Pet., 354; Greenleaf1).Br2Tt/1, 5 Ill, 132; Boardinan v. Reed, 6 d., 3528; Phillips v.' Preston, 5 H0w., Q78; McMicken v. Webb, 6' ld, $2.92; Randon v. '1oby, 11 Id., 493; Thomas v. Lawson, 21 IL, 348; Chandler v. Van Hoeder, 24 Izl., 5925; Thompson v. Roberts, Id_., 333. HARRISON, J. James...
