This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1866 Excerpt: ... Buck Mountain Coal Co. v. Lehigh Coal and Nav. Co. fore, against the complainants' right to maintain an injunction, is necessarily a denial of his equity to have damages on the accounts prayed. Upon these grounds the bill might properly have been dismissed. It is not necessary to discuss the grounds of the alleged claim of damages in this case, as the right to them in this proceeding falls altogether by reason of the views just expressed. Nor is it essential to discuss the question whether the Act of 1818 provided a specific remedy in this case, which excludes a resort to a bill in equity, as we think the whole case is covered by the views taken. We think the action of the court at Nisi Prius, on the demurrer, must be sustained, and accordingly the decree is affirmed, at the cost of the appellants.(a) Walker versus Dehaven. Money charged on land during life of widow is personalty, and payable to administrator of deceased heir. Where, on partition, the interest in the valuation money of the real estate of a decedent, payable at the death of the widow, was secured to a married daughter by recognisance, and after the death of her husband, and subsequently, of the widow, the daughter died also, leaving an only daughter, who afterwards died intestate and without issue, but leaving a husband, who also died shortly after; Held, that the interest in the dower fund passed, as personalty, to his personal representatives: and that the heirs or next of kin of the original cognisee had no interest therein. Error to the Common Pleas of Montgomery county. This was an action on the case by Ivins Walker against Hugh Dehaven and Mary J. his wife, to recover the share of the plaintiff in the sum of $303.87, with interest from the death of Rebecca, the widow of Jonathan Cleave...